From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: lucio@proxima.alt.za (Lucio De Re)
Date: Sun,  3 Apr 2011 16:42:46 +0200
Subject: [9fans] Go Plan 9
In-Reply-To: <033fb4bad1a5301dc98a6c7610c48bd9@ladd.quanstro.net>
References: <BANLkTi=nx_okDT-QLfg8mqZ44i5R4QT6RA@mail.gmail.com>
	<033fb4bad1a5301dc98a6c7610c48bd9@ladd.quanstro.net>
Message-ID: <20110403144246.GE1805@fangle.proxima.alt.za>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c6860c22-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 06:34:28AM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote:
> 
> a real solution would be one of
> 0  copy u.h; hack to taste
> 1  add the hacks to the real u.h
> 2  come to a concensus with go about what the defined-bit-width
> types should be called.  change both plan 9 and go to conform.
> 
> i'd vote for 2.  it's harder that way, but i'd hate for go to
> feel like it was pasted on.  but i'd like to know what everyone
> else thinks.
> 
I don't think anything comes near to 2 as a solution.  And it really
isn't all that invasive either.  Add my vote to yours.

++L