From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David du Colombier <0intro@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 16:10:05 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.34.8-68.fc13.x86_64; KDE/4.5.5; x86_64; ; )
References: <201104240344.27289.errno@cox.net>
	<63d88c3d38162974e6c68ebc13f86f8d@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<201104240431.33591.errno@cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <201104240431.33591.errno@cox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201104241610.06016.0intro@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] kfs and cwfs comparison
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d328bcae-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

kfs is a local and single-user file server without any archiving mechanism.

It was intended to be used on terminals with a disk and it is not aimed to be
used on a file server machine.

It is similar to the "other" file system of ken's fs or cwfs and share most of
its code with it.

--
David du Colombier