From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: errno <errno@cox.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Date: Fri,  6 May 2011 10:38:03 -0700
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.38-ARCH; KDE/4.6.2; i686; ; )
References: <b95d02898da2669c36cd10f59df1929e@terzarima.net>
	<201105060907.07574.errno@cox.net> <4DC421ED.50208@0x6a.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DC421ED.50208@0x6a.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201105061038.03929.errno@cox.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] freedom (was Re:  Compiling 9atom kernel)
Topicbox-Message-UUID: dfba5158-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Friday, May 06, 2011 09:29:33 AM Jack Norton wrote:
> You've got some misplaced idealism.
>

Yeah you're probably right.

> In the end though, the list will eventually say it: start hammering out
> some code and we'll see what you come up with.  Proof in the pudding.
>

Truth.

> errno wrote:
> > From where I stand, this is where Plan 9 belongs. This is what it ought
> > to be doing, and where it ought to be going.
>

And that comment was particularly lame - I'm in no position to
assert what plan 9 "ought" to be doing.

Sorry for that, got carried away.