From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 14:03:13 -0500 From: Daniel Lyons To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Message-ID: <20110512190313.GA14768@clanspum.net> References: <20110512164916.GA12861@clanspum.net> <20110512185230.20B9AB827@mail.bitblocks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110512185230.20B9AB827@mail.bitblocks.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [9fans] exportfs / u9fs / v9fs / npfs / spfs versus 9vx Topicbox-Message-UUID: e27a0d7a-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:52:30AM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote: > On Thu, 12 May 2011 13:14:55 CDT Stanley Lieber wrote: > > http://plan9.bell-labs.com/sources/plan9/sys/src/cmd/unix/u9fs > > > > This is the basis of the OpenBSD port. > > unix/9pfreebsd is really too old to be useful but may be one > can start a new FreeBSD port from the openBSD bits? I'd be > interested in such a thing. It compiles w/ 2 warning messages on my machine. Setting it up is turning out to be interesting. I think probably the safest thing for me to do would be to try tunnelling it over ssh, since both host operating systems can do ssh v2. Still hammering on it. It does look like 9vx isn't really able to talk to the machine from here, which is odd because p9p's srv seems to be able to, at least make the connection, though I'm not having much luck with that either. How are you guys using these tools? -- Daniel Lyons