From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 15:53:15 -0500 From: Daniel Lyons To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Message-ID: <20110512205315.GC14768@clanspum.net> References: <20110512164916.GA12861@clanspum.net> <20110512185230.20B9AB827@mail.bitblocks.com> <20110512190313.GA14768@clanspum.net> <20110512203000.3202DB827@mail.bitblocks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110512203000.3202DB827@mail.bitblocks.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [9fans] exportfs / u9fs / v9fs / npfs / spfs versus 9vx Topicbox-Message-UUID: e2addd76-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 01:30:00PM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote: > On Thu, 12 May 2011 14:03:13 CDT Daniel Lyons wrote: > > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:52:30AM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote: > > > On Thu, 12 May 2011 13:14:55 CDT Stanley Lieber > > wrote: > > > > http://plan9.bell-labs.com/sources/plan9/sys/src/cmd/unix/u9fs > > > > > > > > This is the basis of the OpenBSD port. > > > > > > unix/9pfreebsd is really too old to be useful but may be one > > > can start a new FreeBSD port from the openBSD bits? I'd be > > > interested in such a thing. > > I was thinking of a kernel port (mount_9ufs etc). My hopes > were briefly raised until I realized the openBSD port is not a > kernel port. Though I am not sure if a kernel port is worth it > (and it is certainly a bunch of work). Wouldn't this be for mounting 9p *from* BSD, not exporting BSD's FS *to* 9p? -- Daniel Lyons