From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:22:51 EDT."
	<e8eae789ff564967341ac756e64a5d22@ladd.quanstro.net>
References: <20110628205519.B8D6FB827@mail.bitblocks.com>
	<e8eae789ff564967341ac756e64a5d22@ladd.quanstro.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:41:25 -0700
From: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>
Message-Id: <20110628224125.77CBEB827@mail.bitblocks.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] wirespeed processing @ 10 Gb/s
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f7aebd30-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:22:51 EDT erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>  wrote:
> On Tue Jun 28 16:56:34 EDT 2011, bakul@bitblocks.com wrote:
> > Something like this would make a nice hack!
> >
> > http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/netmap/sigcomm-poster.pdf
> >
> > Our framework, called netmap, maps packet buffers into the
> > process' memory space ...
> >
> > One core at 1.33 GHz can send or receive packets at wire speed
> > on 10 Gbit/s links (14.88 Mpps), with very good scalability in
> > the number of cores and clock speed.
> >
> > netmap is available on FreeBSD.
>
> plan 9 already does wirespeed 2x10gbe "processing", if by
> processing you mean disk i/o.  :-)

By wirespeed the author means processing 14.48M pkts/sec, not
814K pps! AOE is a special case.