From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:43:06 PDT." References: <20110706184008.AC595B827@mail.bitblocks.com> <20110708061922.1CEB3B827@mail.bitblocks.com> <856dd0396cfa3bdef849de6d15d42da8@coraid.com> <42238e75050e3e65ace758f50a089249@ladd.quanstro.net> Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 13:41:19 -0700 From: Bakul Shah Message-Id: <20110708204119.A4A8AB827@mail.bitblocks.com> Subject: Re: [9fans] 9atom & virtualbox 4.0.10 networking issue Topicbox-Message-UUID: fc626e1c-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:43:06 PDT ron minnich wrote: > On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:04 AM, erik quanstrom wrote > : > >> Why is it not fixed? Because, nowadays, the thing you're supposed to > >> use is the ACPI table. We've seen cases where both PIR and _MP_ were > >> copied from a different motherboard, with no change, and were > >> completely wrong. It's obvious that most vendors don't care to take > >> the time to make these tables right. > > > > so why are acpi tables also broken? > > Because, by and large, the vendors don't understand ACPI very well > either, and they tend to just copy and paste. > > But it's still the case for me that PIR and MPI are far less reliable than AC > PI. > > It's why I've gotten to hate PC hardware so much. Virtual box is open source. If you guys know how to fix its emulated PC, I think they will be open to the idea. Erik, I have sent you the $PIR table data you wanted (with and without USB enabled).