From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:55:37 +0100
From: Ethan Grammatikidis <eekee57@fastmail.fm>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <20110712115537.6574d0f3@lahti.ethans.dre.am>
In-Reply-To: <08e97c0e92bc3a82cc2e6746b657a113@ladd.quanstro.net>
References: <CACXGR2Q0bf3dkWGrVT=rkqYrNERe5xdzPuh836CJsbo84A6jVA@mail.gmail.c>
	<aa759fd5a69434167ddfb2fd2fa8e6fe@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<CACXGR2QQx=8dxFbJ0Y6eiS5dTgRA2AjpNvzQZOaVOEgt-MFnsw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACXGR2SCEkWaqEPRZqe7tLgDni6BiEc09MVC-v8puJtUPO7iVQ@mail.gmail.c>
	<08e97c0e92bc3a82cc2e6746b657a113@ladd.quanstro.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan9 on QNAP TS-212 NAS (kw)
Topicbox-Message-UUID: ff811698-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sat, 9 Jul 2011 18:40:49 -0400
erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:

> there are assumptions about the memory size in many devices,

Ouch. Couldn't the kernel probe the memory size at boot time and use that? Or at least have it set in a constant for a single point of change?