From: Ethan Grammatikidis <eekee57@fastmail.fm>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] interesting(?) widgets idea
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 21:34:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110715213431.2e1e37c6@lahti.ethans.dre.am> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E1DA117.2030307@0x6a.com>
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 08:43:51 -0500
Jack Norton <jack@0x6a.com> wrote:
> dexen deVries wrote:
>
> > if the user hovers mouse over widget area, it would be understood as intention to activate widgets, triggering their visibility.
> >
> >...
> > in other words, all the widgets (menus included) of an app turned into margins when mouse's /not/ over those widgets.
> >
> >
>
> eeek!
> Am I the only one who doesn't like this idea? I cannot stand programs
> that change their visual representation based upon where the mouse is,
> or what the keyboard meta keys are up to, etc...
You're definitely not the only one.
> The worst... and I mean worst case of hover-only features is the stupid
> system tray clock in windows xp. I never now when it will be gracious
> enough to give me that little pop-up that tells me the full date/time.
> Or in second place, that little pop-up in windows explorer that gives me
> a (bad) summary of folder contents/size. It's a crap shoot. Hover-only
> stuff is a disease.
I almost said hover-only stuff can be done right, but remembered I've only been relying on it since using trackpads & touchpoints - devices almost incapable of mouse creep, and it's still a little bit of a nuisance.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-15 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-11 14:56 Peter A. Cejchan
2011-07-11 15:14 ` simon softnet
2011-07-11 15:25 ` Peter A. Cejchan
2011-07-11 15:21 ` hiro
2011-07-11 15:23 ` hiro
2011-07-11 15:35 ` Peter A. Cejchan
2011-07-11 15:43 ` dexen deVries
2011-07-11 16:12 ` Peter A. Cejchan
2011-07-11 16:56 ` Jacob Todd
2011-07-11 17:21 ` Peter A. Cejchan
2011-07-11 17:25 ` ron minnich
2011-07-11 17:28 ` dexen deVries
2011-07-12 6:15 ` Peter A. Cejchan
2011-07-11 17:28 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2011-07-11 17:28 ` andrey mirtchovski
2011-07-12 8:23 ` Sergey Kish
2011-07-12 9:18 ` Peter A. Cejchan
2011-07-12 12:18 ` Ethan Grammatikidis
2011-07-12 12:36 ` dexen deVries
2011-07-12 13:00 ` yy
2011-07-12 13:21 ` Jack Norton
2011-07-12 13:40 ` Ethan Grammatikidis
2011-07-12 14:31 ` dexen deVries
2011-07-12 14:56 ` Ethan Grammatikidis
2011-07-12 15:26 ` dexen deVries
2011-07-13 6:02 ` Peter A. Cejchan
2011-07-13 6:12 ` Bruce Ellis
2011-07-14 17:12 ` Yaroslav
2011-07-14 17:22 ` dexen deVries
2011-07-13 13:43 ` Jack Norton
2011-07-13 14:16 ` Wes Kussmaul
2011-07-13 14:45 ` Anthony Sorace
2011-07-15 20:41 ` Ethan Grammatikidis
2011-07-15 20:34 ` Ethan Grammatikidis [this message]
2011-07-15 20:59 ` Wes Kussmaul
2011-07-12 20:52 ` Akshat Kumar
2011-07-13 6:15 ` Peter A. Cejchan
2011-07-13 6:23 ` Bruce Ellis
2011-07-15 20:45 ` Ethan Grammatikidis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110715213431.2e1e37c6@lahti.ethans.dre.am \
--to=eekee57@fastmail.fm \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).