From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 20:32:08 +0100 From: Ethan Grammatikidis To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <20110716203208.5a768dfe@lahti.ethans.dre.am> In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] novel userspace paradigms introduced by plan 9 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 02b8c4dc-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 21:17:14 +0200 simon softnet wrote: > Because it's more likely that users will settle with linux+some plan 9 > features > instead of with pure plan 9 Most of us have to anyway. For now... > > Simon > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:12 PM, David Leimbach wrote: > > > I don't see why anyone combining ideas from Plan 9 into Linux hurts > > Plan 9 as long as Plan 9 continues to exist. > > > > On Saturday, July 16, 2011, simon softnet wrote: > > > Please, don't let plan 9 and linux be interrelated in the future in any > > way ...Future plan 9 users have the opportunity to experience novel > > user-space paradigms.Why do they have to be sucked into the linux world? > > > > > > Simon > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Robert Seaton > > wrote: > > > > > >> one might find http://www.glendix.org/ project interesting > > > > > > The project actually already uses a glendix patched kernel and much of > > > my upcoming work will be focused on porting more of Plan 9's syscalls > > > to the Linux kernel so that more native Plan 9 apps can be run on > > > Linux. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >