From: Ethan Grammatikidis <eekee57@fastmail.fm>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] NUMA
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 18:01:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110717180126.68cedb1c@lahti.ethans.dre.am> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e7221390e41876cb79215f3fbcc9725d@ladd.quanstro.net>
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 10:50:50 -0400
erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
> why do you think the size or complexity of the code has anything
> to do with it?
Good question. I'm not sure I an give a good answer. I do think systems get less flexible as they get more complex. I suppose that isn't provable or always true, but it's empirically "proven" true in my Linux desktop use. As bad as old X11 was, I have repeatedly seen relatively simple ways of solving problems cut off by desktop "solutions" containing implementation details I could never see any use for at all.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-17 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-15 15:15 tlaronde
2011-07-15 20:21 ` tlaronde
2011-07-15 20:47 ` ron minnich
2011-07-15 22:59 ` Charles Forsyth
2011-07-16 8:02 ` tlaronde
2011-07-16 16:27 ` erik quanstrom
2011-07-16 18:06 ` tlaronde
2011-07-16 19:29 ` Ethan Grammatikidis
2011-07-16 19:54 ` erik quanstrom
2011-07-16 20:56 ` dexen deVries
2011-07-16 22:10 ` Charles Forsyth
2011-07-17 1:44 ` erik quanstrom
2011-07-17 7:38 ` tlaronde
2011-07-17 8:44 ` Bakul Shah
2011-07-17 10:02 ` tlaronde
2011-07-17 12:04 ` dexen deVries
2011-07-17 15:24 ` erik quanstrom
2011-07-17 15:28 ` ron minnich
[not found] ` <CAP6exYL2DJXbKfPZ8+D5uL=fRWKEyr8vY2OVc4NTO3wsFo=Unw@mail.gmail.c>
2011-07-17 15:32 ` erik quanstrom
2011-07-17 17:16 ` Bakul Shah
2011-07-17 17:21 ` erik quanstrom
2011-07-17 15:51 ` erik quanstrom
2011-07-17 16:12 ` dexen deVries
2011-07-17 16:37 ` tlaronde
2011-07-17 10:08 ` Ethan Grammatikidis
2011-07-17 14:50 ` erik quanstrom
2011-07-17 17:01 ` Ethan Grammatikidis [this message]
2011-07-17 3:39 ` Joel C. Salomon
2011-07-17 7:01 ` tlaronde
2011-07-17 15:05 ` Joel C. Salomon
2011-07-17 15:26 ` erik quanstrom
2011-07-17 15:52 ` ComeauAt9Fans@gmail.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110717180126.68cedb1c@lahti.ethans.dre.am \
--to=eekee57@fastmail.fm \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).