From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 19:17:10 +0100 From: Ethan Grammatikidis To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <20110722191710.2b1e6766@kolari.ethans.dre.am> In-Reply-To: <20110722174841.GA2065@fangle.proxima.alt.za> References: <201107220536.p6M5agtv019617@freefriends.org> <20110722130310.GO1803@fangle.proxima.alt.za> <142CEA85-FE43-4D87-B08D-BF151422BC07@bitblocks.com> <20110722174841.GA2065@fangle.proxima.alt.za> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: lucio@proxima.alt.za Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 Go (Was: GNU/Linux/Plan 9 disto) Topicbox-Message-UUID: 04f337c8-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 19:48:41 +0200 Lucio De Re wrote: > For the rest, I have been alerted in private mail that Taru's work > contains many adjustments whose intention was to get the code to compile. > I have a similar code base and Erik Quanstrom has another. I know my > early set of patches is totally inadequate today, I often refer to it in > this phase of this project. I presume that Erik and Taru both will find > their patches significantly out of sync with future Go releases before > too long. As it may take me many months to get the project completed, > I'd rather work in tandem with the Go runtime developers, who seem to > have taken the same route as I have, namely to include their changes _in_ > the Go distribution as they go along. My apologies, I didn't understand quite how much the Go codebase changes.