From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:09:35 EDT." <51aa6c9fe264b3a66507d629efe856ec@coraid.com> References: <201107220536.p6M5agtv019617@freefriends.org> <20110722130310.GO1803@fangle.proxima.alt.za> <2f6021d419a7327afa4134cda0e6c88f@ladd.quanstro.net> <20110722153731.GQ1803@fangle.proxima.alt.za> <20110722171320.50A9CB827@mail.bitblocks.com> <20110722183802.60C66B827@mail.bitblocks.com> <20110722185545.87D40B852@mail.bitblocks.com> <51aa6c9fe264b3a66507d629efe856ec@coraid.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:42:24 -0700 From: Bakul Shah Message-Id: <20110722194224.33472B827@mail.bitblocks.com> Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 Go (Was: GNU/Linux/Plan 9 disto) Topicbox-Message-UUID: 059371f2-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:09:35 EDT erik quanstrom wrote: > > What does pcc have to do with this? This is a yacc problem. [Also tested > > on 9atom] > > did you rebuild from source? the yacc binary might be older than ~jan 2010. > > - erik Just did. yacc.c on the 9atom VM has a date of May 6, 2011. Did I do a `pull' since then? No. plan9 for me is just a toy so I avoid using painful things like replica! I don't understand why the main plan9 repo is not switched over to mercurial (or why the community has not agreed on an alternative mercurial repo).