From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:15:09 PDT."
	<CAP6exYLmZXLCgBsczjR5e87B095R231WLp3hi0VZOtxgmBd5kw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20110810220404.D6021B827@mail.bitblocks.com>
	<d12d73be7c53043c2f37dc79d947a424@orthanc.ca>
	<CAP6exY+7NvTrL8O+z7J8RH=0wXTb+zY2xTQVLRSGSQbxqbRaBA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP6exYLmZXLCgBsczjR5e87B095R231WLp3hi0VZOtxgmBd5kw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:20:17 -0700
From: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>
Message-Id: <20110811192017.09CB2B827@mail.bitblocks.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] simple venti demo:
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0f9bcfa0-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:15:09 PDT ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> Could we make little venti files and finally try to build an SCM using
> these files?

Funny you should say that!

May be I should post my half-assed ideas on extending hgfs for
commits etc. I was thinking a proper frontend/backend
separation of an SCM-FS would allow one to choose hg/git/venti
or even some distributed hash thingy as the backend.