9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tlaronde@polynum.com
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: [9fans] circular fonctions: precision?
Date: Sun,  2 Oct 2011 18:38:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111002163800.GA12773@polynum.com> (raw)

Hello,

Is there some documentation about the precision of the circular (i.e
trigonometric) fonctions, depending on the (plan9) implementation and
the hardware?

To my limited knowledge, an OS is integer based, so the floating
point support is mainly "user space" and is, despite IEEE754 and due to
the interaction between hardware, software, and programmer, really
floating, but is there a range given for the association of OS/hardware
telling that say sin(r) or asin(s) is accurate, at worst, at some
epsilon near?

To give a context, say you have arcs connected to nodes, and each node
has information about its connected arcs sorted by angle (2D). If I
want to
find the "straightest" arc continuing arc A through node N, I look for
an arc B so that the angle between A and B is nearest to M_PI. But if
the angles (from the node) had been computed by some circular fonction,
even two originally "straight" arcs may present an angle not exactly
M_PI, due to precision. Hence the question.

Cheers,
--
        Thierry Laronde <tlaronde +AT+ polynum +dot+ com>
                      http://www.kergis.com/
Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89  250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C



             reply	other threads:[~2011-10-02 16:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-02 16:38 tlaronde [this message]
2011-10-02 17:52 ` Bakul Shah
2011-10-02 18:06   ` erik quanstrom
2011-10-02 18:40     ` Bakul Shah
2011-10-02 18:44       ` erik quanstrom
2011-10-02 18:59         ` andrew zerger
2011-10-02 19:04         ` tlaronde
2011-10-02 19:14         ` Bakul Shah
2011-10-02 19:18           ` erik quanstrom
2011-10-02 18:44     ` tlaronde
2011-10-02 18:48       ` tlaronde
2011-10-02 18:28   ` tlaronde
2011-10-02 19:06     ` Bakul Shah
2011-10-03 11:41       ` tlaronde
2011-10-03 14:39         ` Bakul Shah
2011-10-03 14:46           ` erik quanstrom
2011-10-03 15:29             ` Bakul Shah
2011-10-03 15:58               ` Bakul Shah
2011-10-03 16:49           ` tlaronde
2011-10-03 13:03 ` Russ Cox
2011-10-03 14:44   ` Bakul Shah
2011-10-03 14:57     ` Russ Cox
2011-10-03 15:34       ` Bakul Shah
2011-10-03 15:47         ` Russ Cox
2011-10-03 16:53   ` tlaronde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111002163800.GA12773@polynum.com \
    --to=tlaronde@polynum.com \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).