From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 03 Oct 2011 08:29:40 PDT."
	<5A54BCA4-D759-4EDC-9B9E-2259E654EF68@bitblocks.com>
References: <20111002163800.GA12773@polynum.com>
	<20111002175227.2D7F1B856@mail.bitblocks.com>
	<20111002182846.GA20646@polynum.com>
	<20111002190618.54195B852@mail.bitblocks.com>
	<20111003114131.GA7326@polynum.com>
	<1FC8ACD9-092B-43DB-8FF5-206FA5E02C55@bitblocks.com>
	<5c40d8ac0708e6def897a2f6807e20f1@chula.quanstro.net>
	<5A54BCA4-D759-4EDC-9B9E-2259E654EF68@bitblocks.com>
Date: Mon,  3 Oct 2011 08:58:14 -0700
From: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>
Message-Id: <20111003155814.82303B852@mail.bitblocks.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] circular fonctions: precision?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 303fa84e-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 08:29:40 PDT Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>  wrote:
>  In my test library a 'shift' was
> (+ (quotient 512-bit-reg 2^32) new-32-bit-value)).

Oops. I meant:
  (+ (* (quotient 512-bit-reg 2^32) 2^32)) new-32-bit-value)
In one clock the top 32 bits shift out and new 32 bits shift
in.  It has been a while.