From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:17:39 PDT."
	<CAP6exYJf1UKFdpeXyFXRt0Y7hPc=Hyq7oBdvi9uX3Z7+FQbxsA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP6exYK1SaBpCd2yEwv7o_F7BjisWsO7hr==C08RRFQWFnpG-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHfqX-oxrs3BG-sX8wc0-VKzoBStLajvs50ptoEnq62Z+ThdVg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP6exYKpjZONkfMcxptJS_UgO73Sp4RyWsmaFRxRbLZ+F9jtQg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHfqX-rbBYOEkJsKcdij9_pCJUqV_fBB95r0_NwdwX9stjpqNQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK4xykUj+0hXOzqvdqKVWFiSPhSfgM8_p9jreLU5Cgo-g009zg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHfqX-qYHnP9yPSesciDB-YbkmSV2QvX7XyYkEbOsz0_gJjLYg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP6exYK8+DB2P3F1X4tDSs3pdc=takr--AOMAF=FJJG2pprPHw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHfqX-rSHiiN4fQmnT_jXQ+SBS92M1biPhP7WmDhkmYrvseP8Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP6exYJ8MQdcRa1vofMVjgaFK0Xu-po4eZBOObU6=mK_m4HHyA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHfqX-oZrvFg-+Y1S1J8em9au=XkR=e_5CcBtuD8zQe2zqE5=w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP6exY+APJ3V2UGEA960r+5jCqDAxt=GP72OdXO3ud1XNrEEGQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP6exYKrrHOtNX3L_CebF0yxhyESBVhpucpeTopeti94yKuZWg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJSxfmJ_qvKJuzBJ6=Rx3e_Z3zHo18PynDnKEq6yRcceiCykjw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP6exYJf1UKFdpeXyFXRt0Y7hPc=Hyq7oBdvi9uX3Z7+FQbxsA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:34:04 -0700
From: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>
Message-Id: <20111031223404.9FE57B856@mail.bitblocks.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] native (mostly) go for plan9
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3d419e80-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:17:39 PDT ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> I did the lazy thing and commented out the erroneous close for now.
> The easy fix is to track the fds to be closed in a map and then close
> them all later. That's next. Another possibility is to allow '#d/*ctl'
> to be writeable and implement a
> closeonexec
> control message for fds. But maybe that's  just too much. It is
> certainly easy to do, but is that kind of feature something we want to
> add?

May be add `atexec(void(*fun)(void*))'?