From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 24 Nov 2011 14:05:00 PST." References: <20111124211629.44A09B852@mail.bitblocks.com> Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 14:28:12 -0800 From: Bakul Shah Message-Id: <20111124222812.840A8B852@mail.bitblocks.com> Subject: Re: [9fans] Let's get VM configs onto the Wiki. Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4560219a-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 14:05:00 PST ron minnich wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Bakul Shah wrote: > > > But I am not a fan of Wikis. Usually a wiki ends up being an > > unstructured collection of useful facts that can go stale as > > it takes a lot of effort to keep it organized. > > Would be interesting if every wiki entry came with an expiration date, > and entries just went away or no longer appeared. So much of what I > find on wikis is completely wrong any more. A wiki is fine for something like an encyclopedia which is basically a collection of loosely coupled information, or as a corkboard of research notes. A handbook can start out organized. Everything can be put in its proper place, easy to parallelize the effort and reorg is easy (mostly just metadata reorg -- in wiki you will have to do cut-n-paste between pages). See the online FreeBSD handbook for an example.