From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Thu,  1 Dec 2011 11:07:24 -0800
From: Anthony Martin <ality@pbrane.org>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Message-ID: <20111201190724.GA12324@dinah>
References: <20111201174858.GA23075@dinah>
	<CAL4LZyjptQ=QScwYyMurt0OFSd6kAgz4nZnaqYxmwU-Ruxu0YA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111201181455.GC23075@dinah>
	<CAOw7k5ioi2HOhQXQvDtu2ynY5HtTnzDFzK7aRoOtSXa_dkgufw@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.OSX.1.10.1112011025230.649@peregrinwifi.orthanc.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.1.10.1112011025230.649@peregrinwifi.orthanc.ca>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Building Go on Plan 9
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4a4550d6-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> once said:
> I stopped at gmake.  What can't mk do that demands gmake?

There's nothing wrong with mk.  It's just that
I highly doubt we could get a separate set of
mkfiles included in the Go distribution.

I've tried to get things going with the smallest
set of changes to both Plan 9 and Go and I think
using GNU Make is the only way to do that.

  Anthony