From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:34:06 +0100
From: David du Colombier <0intro@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Message-ID: <20111229183406.116cb5fb@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <867h1f4adx.fsf@cmarib.ramside>
References: <86zkecbc5d.fsf@cmarib.ramside> <20111229004856.731689ce@gmail.com>
	<867h1f4adx.fsf@cmarib.ramside>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] p9p vac/vacfs compatibility: uid/gid, ctime, 9P2000.L,
 9pserve
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 51b99c14-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> IIRC, the RFC for it didn't indicate deprecated status.  (Perhaps IETF
> could use an update.)  Assuming it has been deprecated, with what has
> 9p2000.u been replaced?

As far I know, these RFCs were early draft and were never completed
nor submitted.

I think the 9P2000.u authors moved to a new approach, which was
called 9P2010 and is now called 9P2000.l. I don't know anything
about it however.

Anyway, plan9port applications only speak 9P2000.

--
David du Colombier