From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:03:11 EST." <241a425555c280b683eeb6f2c2c819d8@chula.quanstro.net> References: <20120105124852.GA940@polynum.com> <20120105144810.182add7c@wks-ddc.exosec.local> <20120105151518.GB435@polynum.com> <74f17bd79e5a709683d94e72b4459623@lvoc.net> <20120105184858.87B0BB858@mail.bitblocks.com> <20120105195724.626D7B85B@mail.bitblocks.com> <241a425555c280b683eeb6f2c2c819d8@chula.quanstro.net> Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 17:29:15 -0800 From: Bakul Shah Message-Id: <20120108012915.8C315B852@mail.bitblocks.com> Subject: Re: [9fans] venti and "contrib": RFC Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5657905a-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:03:11 EST erik quanstrom wrote: > > > > venti doesn't have a "scrub" command, does it? zfs scrub was > > > > instrumental in warning me that I needed new disks. > > > > > > they're using coraid storage. all this is taken care of for them > > > by the SR appliance. > > > > When are you going to sell these retail?! > > > > The question was for venti though. > > i'm not sure i follow. why can't venti assume a perfect array-of-bytes > device and let the appliance take care of it? If you scrub only the live data, total scrub time becomes a function of used space as opposed to total space. But the main reason for asking was that I was thinking of situations where your appliance is not used but venti is. The illusion of a perfect array-of-bytes abstraction can't always be sustained in any case. Thanks to everyone who set me straight on fossil + venti.