From: tlaronde@polynum.com
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] fossil (again)
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:00:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120113220031.GA421@polynum.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120112222919.0bb0c261@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:29:19PM +0100, David du Colombier wrote:
>
> You should probably try to compare with "du -sh".
BTW, I have "played" with du(1) since it answers partially (Erik gave
data) about the optimization of blocksize. Namely the "-b" option. If I
understand correctly, this does take only "data" block, so no inode or
whatever, but may give a clue about the optimization of blocksize. So:
term% du -s /
364996379 /
term% du -s -b 2048 /
365017964 /
term% du -s -b 8192 /
365080272 /
term% du -s -b 512 /
365002735 /
Well... on this partial evaluation, the winner is 1024, but for 80k,
not a lot to shout about.
For the occupation of fossil, with 8kb:
fsys blocks: total=126524 used=92045(72.7%) free=34464(27.2%) lost=15(0.0%)
So I have roughly twice the size of files in fossil occupation: fossil,
754 Mb, for 365 Mb of "real" data.
I don't get it!
--
Thierry Laronde <tlaronde +AT+ polynum +dot+ com>
http://www.kergis.com/
Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-13 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-10 2:40 tlaronde
2012-01-09 22:23 ` David du Colombier
2012-01-09 22:27 ` David du Colombier
2012-01-09 22:38 ` David du Colombier
2012-01-10 17:11 ` tlaronde
2012-01-10 13:47 ` David du Colombier
2012-01-10 18:00 ` tlaronde
2012-01-13 18:33 ` tlaronde
2012-01-12 21:29 ` David du Colombier
2012-01-12 22:08 ` erik quanstrom
2012-01-12 22:25 ` David du Colombier
2012-01-12 22:37 ` erik quanstrom
2012-01-13 22:00 ` tlaronde [this message]
2012-01-10 0:44 ` erik quanstrom
2012-01-10 5:04 ` Bruce Ellis
2012-01-10 5:30 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2012-01-10 5:34 ` Bruce Ellis
2012-01-10 17:17 ` tlaronde
2012-01-10 17:12 ` tlaronde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120113220031.GA421@polynum.com \
--to=tlaronde@polynum.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).