From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 23:01:33 +0200
From: David du Colombier <0intro@gmail.com>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <20120511230133.7c362a0b@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D2A5C7470D67A54FACE86B838946D49D14E466F6C4@NJ4MSGSCR02.markit.partners>
References: <D2A5C7470D67A54FACE86B838946D49D14E466F692@NJ4MSGSCR02.markit.partners>
	<CAMdzYRo0fg64MQykCkH2nHDSB=nOauTc66y+8pZGC-T+N9Ldfw@mail.gmail.c>
	<2618368964be9bae4cc045fff8c95781@coraid.com>
	<D2A5C7470D67A54FACE86B838946D49D14E466F6C3@NJ4MSGSCR02.markit.partners>
	<D2A5C7470D67A54FACE86B838946D49D14E466F6C4@NJ4MSGSCR02.markit.partners>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] IL depreciated
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8973ea88-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Is there no encryption support for 9P?

cpu(1), import(4) and exportfs(4) supports optional
encryption using the ssl(3) record layer.

--
David du Colombier