From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 11:05:26 -0400
From: Kurt H Maier <khm-9@intma.in>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Message-ID: <20120516150526.GA77302@intma.in>
References: <e28d7aa800bff3aba9feb3cdc96c2819@sp.inri.net>
	<cbba16d79053cc9117b6859f2373235f@coraid.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <cbba16d79053cc9117b6859f2373235f@coraid.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] rc behavior with rfork
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8f870194-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:35:20AM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote:
> On Wed May 16 10:33:50 EDT 2012, sl@9front.org wrote:
> > The confusing part to me is why >[2] or >[3] or >[4]
> > (and so on) captures the stdout of the @{} block.
> >
>
> yes, it is confusing.  but that's how rc rolls.
>
> - erik
>


thanks for letting us know