From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 11:47:04 -0400
From: Kurt H Maier <khm-9@intma.in>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Message-ID: <20120828154704.GA10485@intma.in>
References: <20120828150521.GA10731@intma.in>
	<ea7f747589a78f5d1c0ed50a9a5b6ab7@proxima.alt.za>
	<20120828153548.GC11005@intma.in>
	<6f3f5feb8c830473fc37b9cdccaef3b9@brasstown.quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6f3f5feb8c830473fc37b9cdccaef3b9@brasstown.quanstro.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] rc vs sh
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b144b2f4-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:41:05AM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote:
>
> so what's the reason for this argument on 9fans?  is it that it makes
> building go on plan 9 harder?
>

I think it started out with rc users defending their purity of essence.
I'm just an Unattached Lensman with the Galactic Bullshit Patrol.