From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 29 Oct 2012 22:47:02 -0000."
	<CAOw7k5hvkWuoD0dLR57Q0xw-6RKJgfHOxD1scdpK48nE_Xuhcw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <15723310.yIARpoJMSL@coil>
	<4824335454f1b1d47dbc8439b4af8ea3@kw.quanstro.net>
	<20121029223541.8C198B827@mail.bitblocks.com>
	<CAOw7k5hvkWuoD0dLR57Q0xw-6RKJgfHOxD1scdpK48nE_Xuhcw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:05:35 -0700
From: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>
Message-Id: <20121029230535.730EFB827@mail.bitblocks.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] caveat... optimizer? the `zero and forget' thread on HN
Topicbox-Message-UUID: cc307d96-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 22:47:02 -0000 Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> He can fool it once, but can he fool it twice? Can he recompile?

Why not.  Compilers never get wise to the ways of sneaky programmers!