From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:26:52 PDT."
	<20121029232652.5160BB827@mail.bitblocks.com>
References: <15723310.yIARpoJMSL@coil>
	<4824335454f1b1d47dbc8439b4af8ea3@kw.quanstro.net>
	<20121029223541.8C198B827@mail.bitblocks.com>
	<0f05642b113b3ecfc160e82a9ca4db32@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<20121029232652.5160BB827@mail.bitblocks.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:31:19 -0700
From: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>
Message-Id: <20121029233119.3083BB827@mail.bitblocks.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] caveat... optimizer? the `zero and forget' thread on HN
Topicbox-Message-UUID: cc8d6b32-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:26:52 PDT Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>  wrote:
>
> /sys/src/cmd follows plan9 c, not c99, right? But pick a
> similar set of programs.  If this happens, I claim it would be
> because programs assume something not guaranteed by the
> compiler.

Oops.  Meant to say "not guaranteed by the standard".