From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 08:55:28 +0100 From: tlaronde@polynum.com To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Message-ID: <20121030075528.GA548@polynum.com> References: <15723310.yIARpoJMSL@coil> <4824335454f1b1d47dbc8439b4af8ea3@kw.quanstro.net> <20121029223541.8C198B827@mail.bitblocks.com> <0f05642b113b3ecfc160e82a9ca4db32@brasstown.quanstro.net> <20121029232652.5160BB827@mail.bitblocks.com> <74f73b64cc6de4a3bd10367591439816@kw.quanstro.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: [9fans] caveat... optimizer? the `zero and forget' thread on HN Topicbox-Message-UUID: ccf46c56-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:58:23PM +0000, Charles Forsyth wrote: > > But suppose the standard does not evidently aim to be understood, in the > generally understood meaning of "understood", > or there are more words in the standard than will ever appear in the > programmer's own programs? Do you mean as if standards were designed or "improved" by committees? Please: stop spreading FUD! (Were are my drops? I have tachycardia again!) -- Thierry Laronde http://www.kergis.com/ Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C