From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 22:34:40 +0100
From: tlaronde@polynum.com
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Message-ID: <20130323213440.GA9119@polynum.com>
References: <3cc88210bb38cbcfdf60e3192eb60de5@hamnavoe.com>
	<06d6be2a75e196c5a37a4c33c3789dc7@quintile.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <06d6be2a75e196c5a37a4c33c3789dc7@quintile.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [9fans] gcc not an option for Plan9
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 321024cc-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 09:56:19AM +0000, Steve Simon wrote:
> I wonder if the new gcc will be written in cfront compatible
> c++ - that would work... ?

I guess the answer is: no, since the compiler has to be C++ 2003
compatible. But I guess too that your mention of cfront was a joke...
--
        Thierry Laronde <tlaronde +AT+ polynum +dot+ com>
                      http://www.kergis.com/
Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89  250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C