From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 21:54:52 -0400
From: Kurt H Maier <khm-9@intma.in>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Message-ID: <20130325015452.GA159@intma.in>
References: <CAFiGbxj9QGf7WZxqH7OPe4qGQ+-5d0GeRdxcX6kfcyZ6PaZLnw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEoi9W48fUY=gn3SrnZgGrbDeAQZ5w+y-9-ETMcEjq0hCzbkHw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130325013654.GA99552@intma.in>
	<CAEoi9W7TN5RT59Z0vzBWF+VsqmcDGhYaH_+yB=+hWPoOT_HYvA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAEoi9W7TN5RT59Z0vzBWF+VsqmcDGhYaH_+yB=+hWPoOT_HYvA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] gcc not an option for Plan9
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 33a1fc52-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 09:42:09PM -0400, Dan Cross wrote:
> Yeah.  Or someone who is arguably the biggest problem on the list adding
> absolutely nothing other than some uninformed, dogmatically driven, rigid
> meta-commentary.  Maybe that's all that person can do.  He should keep
> feeling smug while turning the crank, though: he obviously knows more than
> the guy who designed and wrote most of it.
>

...wait.  Are we talking about you?  Because I was talking about Rob
Pike.

khm