From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Wed,  1 May 2013 08:49:14 +0200
From: tlaronde@polynum.com
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Message-ID: <20130501064914.GA474@polynum.com>
References: <20130430154627.GA18540@polynum.com>
	<aad110f0bff143c1ae7a35de36c54f81@quintile.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <aad110f0bff143c1ae7a35de36c54f81@quintile.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [9fans] [GSOC 2013] Implement plan9 commands in Go, Goblin
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4de02f80-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 07:18:16PM +0100, Steve Simon wrote:
>[...]
> I have also ported rc(1) and a base set of command line tools to
> win32. rc(1) builds standalone but some of the tools need libregexp
> libbio and libstring which included
>

Well, I'm definitively interested since I'd like to have a defined
minimal set of tools (mainly text ones) plus rc(1) for compilation (for
creating Makefiles---whatever flavor, maybe mk(1) ones---using the
native or cross-compilers with my R.I.S.K. framework, that I started
to use for Plan9 or Unices like, but for Windows too for kerTeX)
and for providing the tools to have only rc(1) scripts for kerTeX
on whatever system (for the system(3) invocations---for MetaPost---or
for administrating the packages).

--
        Thierry Laronde <tlaronde +AT+ polynum +dot+ com>
                      http://www.kergis.com/
Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89  250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C