From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 17:21:44 +0200 From: tlaronde@polynum.com To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Message-ID: <20130502152144.GB490@polynum.com> References: <20130502132556.GA2653@polynum.com> <257b5f.1257db09.089d.mx@tumtum.plumbweb.net> <20130502145139.GB438@polynum.com> <20130502151034.GB73959@intma.in> Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20130502151034.GB73959@intma.in> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: [9fans] Octets regexp Topicbox-Message-UUID: 50e8e41a-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 11:10:34AM -0400, Kurt H Maier wrote: > Why does this functionality have to be overloaded into existing tools > that are already in common use? > I'm speaking about the libregexp. Not about the use existing tools do with it. -- Thierry Laronde http://www.kergis.com/ Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C