From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 10:34:15 -0400 From: Kurt H Maier To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Message-ID: <20130503143415.GA98411@intma.in> References: <64e57b5cc889082953a7f022f534b833@quintile.net> <922ae5cff3657bef4ac9c1c7bfc55e18@kw.quanstro.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <922ae5cff3657bef4ac9c1c7bfc55e18@kw.quanstro.net> Subject: Re: [9fans] anyone attempted to build ghostscript recently? Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5404f97c-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 10:22:13AM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote: > > one question, though. are there better alternatives than ghostscript evince is a poppler frontend; poppler's problematic dependencies include glib and cmake. poppler is descended from xpdf, whose problematic dependencies are include freetype and motif, although I believe the actual pdf rendering code doesn't invoke any motif. khm