From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 21 Aug 2013 17:44:03 EDT."
	<1c77ed407dc1ed28544e2033df7088ce@brasstown.quanstro.net>
References: <2332222c9f75f30c6395f16787280535@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<20130821184909.51FA2B827@mail.bitblocks.com>
	<d92931b41d270e71c61f582b9860649c@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<0A2E2FB2-B2F1-444E-AF62-85FAC05335EA@bitblocks.com>
	<1c77ed407dc1ed28544e2033df7088ce@brasstown.quanstro.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:32:43 -0700
From: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>
Message-Id: <20130822153243.A567AB827@mail.bitblocks.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] more on why vc can't produce amd64 executables
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 73fec4b0-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 17:44:03 EDT erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
>
> i think a bug is setting inuxi8[i+4] = inuxi8[i] for 0<=i<4.
> mikro; diffy -c *.c
> diff -c /n/dump/2013/0821/sys/src/cmd/6l/obj.c obj.c
> /n/dump/2013/0821/sys/src/cmd/6l/obj.c:1455,1471 - obj.c:1455,1471
>   	int i, c;
>
>   	for(i=0; i<4; i++) {
> - 		c = find1(0x04030201L, i+1);
> + 		c = find1(0x0807060504030201ULL, i+1);

Why not
	for(i=0; i<8; i++) {
Else what is the point of
		c = find1(0x0807060504030201ULL, i+1);
Just eyeballing. I haven't looked at the actual code.