From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:03:55 +0200."
	<CAEAzY3_E7mu+J2hJNAWjOt5i0zFME72MYBKHtdFL5fE5UjFqnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20131010170840.02c77c21@zinc.9fans.fr>
	<c1f7906ff76a623e41717a00546abd74@hamnavoe.com>
	<CAEAzY3_E7mu+J2hJNAWjOt5i0zFME72MYBKHtdFL5fE5UjFqnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 09:16:02 -0700
From: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>
Message-Id: <20131010161602.0FEF5B827@mail.bitblocks.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] VMware and 9atom
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8503940c-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:03:55 +0200 =?UTF-8?B?QXJhbSBIxIN2xINybmVhbnU=?= <aram.h@mgk.ro> wrote:
> I will never understand people's fascination with VirtualBox. Why
> bother with all this versioning stuff; what VirtualBox version, what
> kernel. Qemu works, and works much better.

Avoid blindly upgrading to the latest version and there is no
problem.  VB has worked the best for me for hosting variety of
OSes I use (or used to use) on FreeBSD, OS X, Linux, Windows
at various times.  Can't say the same for other VM solutions.
[Now there two fascinations you won't understand!]