From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Thu,  7 Nov 2013 18:46:00 -0800
From: Nick Owens <mischief@9.offblast.org>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <20131108024600.GN11218@iota.offblast.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lBqJz4CGKwlWe7/k"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: [9fans] acid analogues of gdb stepping commands
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 89fcd4d2-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025


--lBqJz4CGKwlWe7/k
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

9fans,

i find myself needing to use acid a lot lately, and maybe i am going
about it wrong. i very much dislike that when i next() in acid, acid
will step through every subcall. what i would like is that it would
instead behave more like gdb's next. is this crazy or am i going about
using acid wrong?

maybe someone has acid analogues of gdb's next, finish, until as
described here.

https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Continuing-and-Stepping.html

nick


--lBqJz4CGKwlWe7/k
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (OpenBSD)

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSfFBoAAoJEAlFY6k1Rs31P2kQAJ1jjWxW1OwU5OzmsxArma7h
jFZtHGEoACeBcEH9DvYz8PgJ3WSOE0XZ8WnXcjyHo1LqTXZjWypLGWWCE1mpmC8B
ucOIjFXZe9rpDTpbg7Lwce+l7bvnpXzJhaDc3fYRT41sKq20ldADdw73DTRFphA4
Irxog7NCKNUlcKq5XtFdG+tqIPVoahcVPGnxU+EPVb2DJc/Cs8uvx+k1i0fSAs82
T96agv1Be/ZZABawkmsvcQ8HLvzbM184YfJgM/yxlDEpK+wZ3G7/5ynz10hG8QRd
Shw+YZHY/dq6uQfpG7S82wrNVtp53kD1hUVoqKhVLMTswrkTOtMoMal1fojFGq0K
LkWZROo/tFvRS4zJoMVLSi+0nj6iM3x62i4okhBlKhfiLeMQm2KzCAdc2BtYE5RD
XcmiacpJxUwDRcmvdUtl+FUHW1229DbNkvDf23qgRPiVInVAMOBke3nXWElZ7B/r
YeAdotUPbd7GECO4F+BDlXOHAO3RkiLl6gmSTZjCDFFmhmhPxP9oOh/DjS2UNnkn
BQFk1oxffsXyMbqS4gChhj43p2q0DLbzwN1IdTzNSrTDPAjyO26rUtONgB9YN9XW
JdLdDXNg5k/oQZQ4LC4+bDiS8P8IHE/dzBli6u44Rm48Nu0BzxbXLoMQUAtA6g8V
Dgswp8hQ9PrVe0iUbnOC
=rD93
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--lBqJz4CGKwlWe7/k--