9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Adding a new user on 9-Front
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 23:54:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131223235419.Horde.Ld29eJHbaIBoe0oX_BOLhQ2@ssl.eumx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18b8d3d0c6c2a261b2c805e625081143@ladd.quanstro.net>

Quoting erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>:

> On Mon Dec 23 17:10:13 EST 2013, sl@9front.org wrote:

> isn't this a false dichotomy?  rudeness doesn't preserve value.

Neither does gladhanding.

> it's easy to point out past mistakes.  do you think these were obvious
> at the time they were made?

Whether they were obvious is too subjective to determine.  They were
(often very loudly) recognized as mistakes.  The problem, as usual,
is that a well-funded mistake is far more likely to succeed than an
impoverished masterpiece.

Obvious?  I'll never know.  But people I respect decried lots of these
decisions at the time they were made.  Without getting into the chicken-
and-egg problem of how I came to respect some of these people, in a lot
of cases, stumbling across an angry netnews missive from a usenet address
I trusted was catalytic in my process of coming to grips with some
understanding of correct software design.

The Unix Hater's Handbook is a collection of articles in this vein; there
are systems eulogized therein which were displaced by the rise of unix,
and whose passing makes me truly sad to have missed out on an era of
computing with real diversity in system design.

This is why harmful.cat-v.org is so important, and it's why I don't have
any interest in suffering fools on internet mailing lists.  If community
is important in guiding software trends, it's important to nip encroaching
macrocultures in the bud; otherwise we wind up with POSIX everywhere, and
an entire generation of computer users who can't even conceive of a world
without it.

People like Blake can present me with bullshit about 'living in a cave' all
day long -- but the surest way to prevent mistakes is to cause people to
defend proposed change within an inch of their lives.  That's the original
point of a thesis defense, and the principal is no less valid on a mail
list.  Most people seem to take such challenges personally;  this is just
because they're not used to being challenged.  It will pass.

khm




  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-12-23 23:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-23  2:37 Blake McBride
2013-12-23  5:19 ` Sergey Zhilkin
2013-12-23  6:15   ` Matthew Veety
2013-12-23 13:34     ` erik quanstrom
2013-12-23 13:46       ` Richard Miller
2013-12-23 13:55         ` erik quanstrom
2013-12-23 14:36   ` Blake McBride
2013-12-23 15:10   ` Blake McBride
2013-12-23 15:32     ` Bence Fábián
2013-12-23 17:13       ` sl
2013-12-23 18:00       ` Blake McBride
2013-12-23 18:03         ` Blake McBride
2013-12-23 18:28           ` Kurt H Maier
2013-12-23 20:03             ` Blake McBride
2013-12-23 20:18               ` erik quanstrom
2013-12-23 20:23               ` Rubén Berenguel
2013-12-23 20:48                 ` Blake McBride
2013-12-23 21:20                   ` Steve Simon
2013-12-23 20:51               ` Kurt H Maier
2013-12-23 21:45                 ` Blake McBride
2013-12-23 22:00                   ` Matthew Veety
2013-12-23 22:07                   ` sl
2013-12-23 22:45                     ` erik quanstrom
2013-12-23 23:47                       ` sl
2013-12-23 23:54                       ` Kurt H Maier [this message]
2013-12-24 12:06                         ` Steffen Daode Nurpmeso
2013-12-24 12:24                           ` lucio
2013-12-24 17:47                             ` Steffen Daode Nurpmeso
2013-12-25  5:30                               ` lucio
2013-12-25  5:58                         ` Federico G. Benavento
2013-12-24  0:16                   ` Kurt H Maier
2013-12-24  0:57                     ` andrey mirtchovski
2013-12-24  2:49                       ` Skip Tavakkolian
2013-12-24  3:03                         ` Bruce Ellis
2013-12-23 19:18           ` Richard Miller
2013-12-23 19:30             ` cinap_lenrek
2013-12-23 19:37               ` erik quanstrom
2013-12-23 20:29                 ` cinap_lenrek
2013-12-23 15:42     ` cinap_lenrek
2013-12-23  9:38 ` Richard Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131223235419.Horde.Ld29eJHbaIBoe0oX_BOLhQ2@ssl.eumx.net \
    --to=khm@sciops.net \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).