From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Thu,  3 Apr 2014 08:00:22 +0200
From: David du Colombier <0intro@gmail.com>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <20140403080022.031ac2f0@zinc.9fans.fr>
In-Reply-To: <2074f7198941eebee93712593dadca08@jitaku.localdomain>
References: <CAA6Yd9UXY1d_rAv+SVy-yreynCVZfuGrHCZd4h_FuwZYhAFO9w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANUoZoH28roGrBMvsRuZ0dpfYRHUSbaFb3Nj_PbX10ws2Veb3Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA6Yd9VfU3V0=QO2H29hZ9G-qnPcwqH=DSsP1yeT-WB1ky=vHw@mail.gmail.com>
	<5332c061.924ab40a.15cc.55a2@mx.google.com>
	<CAA6Yd9VoqMxvUv+LEEN2f=qXMK2-iNTs+n7DebHq_Aad28gYnQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140402071913.72076a71@zinc.9fans.fr>
	<ee7104d9295b428d4800ac0fa67a11b9@jitaku.localdomain>
	<2074f7198941eebee93712593dadca08@jitaku.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Python/Mercurial error
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d4dc7016-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Sorry, David.
> I made mistake to copy your patch file to Plan9
> system (I've not set abaco yet).
>
> I retried your above patch, and perfectly seamless results
> which are included here.

I don't think the error you encountered was related to
the patch, since it's only related to a compilation
issue on 9atom. As long as the Go compilation succeed
on 9atom, the patch was successfully applied.

> ?   	cmd/nm	[no test files]
> pack.test 1119: suicide: sys: trap: fault read addr=0xeafffffc
> pc=0x254b6 *** Test killed: ran too long (3m0s).
> FAIL	cmd/pack	180.007s
> ?   	cmd/yacc	[no test files]

It was probably a real error. However, other 9atom
users have not encountered it and it didn't fail
for you the second time you tried, so it would
tend to prove that it doesn't happen every time.

--
David du Colombier