From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Tue,  6 May 2014 11:39:03 +0200
From: tlaronde@polynum.com
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Message-ID: <20140506093903.GA483@polynum.com>
References: <CAAVq3r=4RODigHFguqNhK89oOhF8viNQqei-ktyHqCCivDaJrA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOw7k5hxX20=euFMeHYGh__ukJvmzffro_6F7+f-Tem9UkTDzA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOw7k5i8XGhVQNinXFmRGwXHcSWVu8w1tM5uD+c7iLQLVL=zjg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOw7k5i8XGhVQNinXFmRGwXHcSWVu8w1tM5uD+c7iLQLVL=zjg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [9fans] [GSOC] fast kernel compile
Topicbox-Message-UUID: ded09a0c-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 09:02:21AM +0100, Charles Forsyth wrote:
> On 6 May 2014 03:19, Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Of course, that's balanced
> by browsers now easily rivalling the kernels you mention for complexity and
> certainly size, with their brutalist programming architectures.

And it is even not a problem reserved to Plan9. On a NetBSD, I tried to
compile chrome. The PC had even not enough _memory_ to link the thing...

--
        Thierry Laronde <tlaronde +AT+ polynum +dot+ com>
                      http://www.kergis.com/
              http://www.renaissance-francaise.fr/
Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89  250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C