From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 23:12:32 +0000 Message-ID: <20140519231232.Horde.xWPdnU_4UAk6dvlshwIg4A7@ssl.eumx.net> From: Kurt H Maier To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> References: <92606a17ce255a2e74049e4090d948b3@proxima.alt.za> <36c5eca0f06e9acbe2fac19067f457d8@ladd.quanstro.net> <20140519195016.B21E6B827@mail.bitblocks.com> <3a6dcbf0845989d60e627ad4e5df4313@ladd.quanstro.net> <20140519230225.Horde.5MmCmKbYSCgLlmaP7PPNFQ1@ssl.eumx.net> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H5 (6.1.6) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: [9fans] syscall 53 Topicbox-Message-UUID: e935d020-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Quoting andrey mirtchovski : > golang-dev has more clout than 9fans nowadays, at least as it > pertains to plan9. > That's why I'm asking. We now have three go-related new syscalls, while lots of actual hardware support gets flushed down the toilet for unspecified reasons. I'm not complaining; I'm just wondering how to adapt to the new system. Sending code to the labs directly doesn't work; fine. How do we lobby golang-dev? khm