9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] cache lines, and 60000 cycles of doom
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 22:09:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140620050945.6C4E7B827@mail.bitblocks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:01:10 EDT." <399b6c5c08b7aeab53f52ce0414714bf@brasstown.quanstro.net>

On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:01:10 EDT erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
> i'm seeing some mighty interesting timing on my intel ivy bridge.
> i found a bug in the file server aoe implementation (can't happen
> if you're using the uniprocessor x86 version) that happens because
> the Srb is freed before wakeup completes.  to solve this there is
> some code that sets the state (this is from ken's ancient scheduler,
> by way of sape)
>
> 	wakeup(&srb);
> 	srb->state = Free;
>
> code that receives it is like this
>
> 	sleep(&srb, srbdone, srb);
> 	cycles(&t0);
> 	for(n = 0; srb->state != Free; n++){
> 		if(srb->wmach == m->machno)
> 			sched();
> 		else
> 			monmwait(&srb->state, Alloc);
> 	}
> 	cycles(&t1);
> 	free(srb);
>
> the astounding thing is that t1-t0 is often ~ 60,000 cycles.
> it only hits a small fraction of the time, and the average is
> much lower.  but that just blows the mind.  60000 cycles!
>
> (other versions with sched were much worse.)
>
> as far as i can tell, there are no funny bits in the scheduler that
> can cause this, and no wierd scheduling is going on.
>
> i'm baffled.

Could there've been a context switch?



  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-06-20  5:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-19 16:01 erik quanstrom
2014-06-20  5:03 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2014-06-20 11:50   ` erik quanstrom
2014-06-20 12:47     ` Devon H. O'Dell
2014-06-20 13:07       ` erik quanstrom
2014-06-20  5:09 ` Bakul Shah [this message]
2014-06-20 11:45   ` erik quanstrom

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140620050945.6C4E7B827@mail.bitblocks.com \
    --to=bakul@bitblocks.com \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).