From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Tue,  2 Sep 2014 21:50:53 +0000
Message-ID: <20140902215053.Horde.Ajvc1qAreH0gSqu6LYJmDw6@ssl.eumx.net>
From: Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
References: <346c54679a6cdc9bb557724d8b93bbc6@quintile.net>
	<6e2a7a02201fcf3ea5d0d894d0d16916@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<20140902200400.81EAAB827@mail.bitblocks.com>
	<14dad84410389f1daea3b71e632cb980@ladd.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <14dad84410389f1daea3b71e632cb980@ladd.quanstro.net>
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H5 (6.1.6)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [9fans] silly question
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 150a41c2-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Quoting erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>:


> correct.  plan 9 does not bother with leap seconds.


seconds(1) "handles" leap seconds in that it will not crash
when it encounters them -- it accepts that sometimes there
are 61 seconds in a minute.

khm