From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 02 Sep 2014 19:19:59 EDT." References: <346c54679a6cdc9bb557724d8b93bbc6@quintile.net> <6e2a7a02201fcf3ea5d0d894d0d16916@ladd.quanstro.net> <20140902200400.81EAAB827@mail.bitblocks.com> <14dad84410389f1daea3b71e632cb980@ladd.quanstro.net> <20140902215053.Horde.Ajvc1qAreH0gSqu6LYJmDw6@ssl.eumx.net> <20140902230443.0A3E9B82A@mail.bitblocks.com> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 16:29:29 -0700 From: Bakul Shah Message-Id: <20140902232929.2C34EB827@mail.bitblocks.com> Subject: Re: [9fans] silly question Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1528fcf2-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 19:19:59 EDT erik quanstrom wrote: > > I was mistaken. Turns out neither do Unix systems handle > > leapseconds. Now if only ITU punts on leapseconds in 2015, we > > can let some future generation worry about leap minutes or > > hours! Sorry for the noise. > > or we can give up on noon being a particular solar time. this would > free us from timezones, dst and other complications. just kidding ... maybe. The wikipedia entry on leap second is quite instructive.