From: plannine@sigint.cs.purdue.edu
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Factotum vs SASL
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 10:40:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141202154044.GA29342@sigint.cs.purdue.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a9526966af259bbe8be7c3dcca184537@lilly.quanstro.net>
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 08:08:04PM -0800, erik quanstrom wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 20:46:08 +0100, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
>> So, how would a Plan9 solution for these usecases look like ?
>>
>> In fact, I intend to rewrite network-manager to some 9p-based solution,
>> so I'd like to discuss this carefully before starting to lennert up
>> something stupid.
>
> has it occured to you to try the system out as is? nobody else has
> asked for it to be more unix like in the same way. perhaps there's
> good reason for it to be the way it is.
To be fair, he's not talking about using Plan 9, just leveraging something
factotum-like under Linux. I think he should be commended for spreading
the 9love in the face of rampant Lennartism, quixotic though it may be.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-02 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-17 5:03 Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2014-11-17 5:57 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2014-11-17 6:29 ` lucio
2014-11-17 13:58 ` erik quanstrom
2014-11-17 14:14 ` lucio
2014-11-18 8:22 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2014-11-29 19:46 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2014-11-29 19:46 ` erik quanstrom
2014-11-29 21:20 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2014-11-29 21:23 ` erik quanstrom
2014-12-01 6:28 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2014-12-01 7:00 ` lucio
2014-12-01 10:38 ` tlaronde
2014-12-01 10:45 ` lucio
2014-12-02 4:00 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2014-12-02 4:08 ` erik quanstrom
2014-12-02 15:40 ` plannine [this message]
2014-12-02 16:33 ` Wes Kussmaul
2014-12-02 20:32 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2014-12-02 22:20 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2014-12-02 9:50 ` Richard Miller
2014-12-02 22:15 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2014-12-01 12:14 ` Stuart Morrow
2014-12-02 20:32 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2015-01-01 14:55 ` Teodoro Santoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141202154044.GA29342@sigint.cs.purdue.edu \
--to=plannine@sigint.cs.purdue.edu \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).