From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 21:12:48 +0000 Message-ID: <20150529211248.Horde.KX_OffdaJ1iY0Du6zyO7vRu@ssl.eumx.net> From: Kurt H Maier To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> References: <5d77545a7c65305168ec9ff261473641@felloff.net> <0db3bca19b4d5a8674289f5533024e12@lilly.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: <0db3bca19b4d5a8674289f5533024e12@lilly.quanstro.net> User-Agent: Horde Application Framework 5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: [9fans] Ports tree for Plan 9 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 564fa12c-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Quoting erik quanstrom : > On Wed May 27 12:51:19 PDT 2015, cinap_lenrek@felloff.net wrote: >> > A potential bug in APE sys/wait.h : the header does not make sure >> that pid_t >> > has been defined. >> > Compiling sbase on Plan9/APE ended up in situations where there >> were lots of >> > compilation faliures simply because was included without >> > being included before. >> >> fixed. > > uh, i just read the open group spec. i did not see the requirement > that wait.h > define pid_t. if someone could site chapter and verse, i would be > happy to add > the include, but it would seem hasty without a standards citation. > > - erik Which version? "The id_t and pid_t types shall be defined as described in ." in issue 6 "The header shall define the id_t and pid_t types as described in ." in issue 7 in the sys/wait.h part of the headers section of base definitions khm