From: Aleksandar Kuktin <akuktin@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: [9fans] RUDP and/or others
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 00:43:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151019004356.3b020ab3@ikilid> (raw)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
So there I was, shopping around for reliable datagram protocols when
BAM! I run straight into RUDP. "Designed at Bell Labs for the Plan 9
operating system". I just skimmed through the (expired) IETF draft from
1999 and I honestly think the design might be too much. It looks like
it's almost completely like TCP, but without segmenting and possibly
with double checksumming. Seems like overkill.
Anyone know of a leaner reliable datagram protocol? I know I saw one a
year ago, but I just can't remember what it was!
- --
Svi moji e-mailovi su kriptografski potpisani. Proverite ih.
All of my e-mails are cryptographically signed. Verify them.
- --
You don't need an AI for a robot uprising.
Humans will do just fine.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)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=ueEt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next reply other threads:[~2015-10-18 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-18 22:43 Aleksandar Kuktin [this message]
2015-10-18 22:48 ` Aleksandar Kuktin
2015-10-19 0:05 ` erik quanstrom
2015-10-18 23:15 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2015-10-18 23:59 ` erik quanstrom
2015-10-19 0:09 ` Kurt H Maier
2015-10-19 0:35 ` erik quanstrom
2015-10-19 0:48 ` Kurt H Maier
2015-10-19 9:28 ` hiro
2015-10-19 20:42 ` Aleksandar Kuktin
2015-10-19 19:36 ` Aleksandar Kuktin
2015-10-19 20:53 ` Aleksandar Kuktin
2015-10-19 19:31 ` Aleksandar Kuktin
2015-10-19 20:57 ` Aleksandar Kuktin
2015-10-19 21:17 ` Charles Forsyth
2015-10-19 9:14 ` Charles Forsyth
2015-10-19 19:29 ` Aleksandar Kuktin
2023-05-10 22:33 [9fans] Romano
2023-05-10 22:36 ` [9fans] RUDP and/or others unobe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151019004356.3b020ab3@ikilid \
--to=akuktin@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).