From: Aleksandar Kuktin <akuktin@gmail.com>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] RUDP and/or others
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 22:57:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151019225732.70fccc14@ikilid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151019213143.148482d7@ikilid>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 21:31:43 +0200
>Aleksandar Kuktin <akuktin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> >On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 16:15:13 -0700
> >Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Anyone know of a leaner reliable datagram protocol? I know I saw
> > > one a year ago, but I just can't remember what it was!
> >
> > are you looking for Internet Link (IL)?
>
> I seem to remember IL being more complex than just a UDP with counters
> and ACK, which is what I'm - sort of - looking for.
>
> But I'll look into it, it's worth it.
TFTP?
- --
Svi moji e-mailovi su kriptografski potpisani. Proverite ih.
All of my e-mails are cryptographically signed. Verify them.
- --
You don't need an AI for a robot uprising.
Humans will do just fine.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)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=EJJN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-19 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-18 22:43 Aleksandar Kuktin
2015-10-18 22:48 ` Aleksandar Kuktin
2015-10-19 0:05 ` erik quanstrom
2015-10-18 23:15 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2015-10-18 23:59 ` erik quanstrom
2015-10-19 0:09 ` Kurt H Maier
2015-10-19 0:35 ` erik quanstrom
2015-10-19 0:48 ` Kurt H Maier
2015-10-19 9:28 ` hiro
2015-10-19 20:42 ` Aleksandar Kuktin
2015-10-19 19:36 ` Aleksandar Kuktin
2015-10-19 20:53 ` Aleksandar Kuktin
2015-10-19 19:31 ` Aleksandar Kuktin
2015-10-19 20:57 ` Aleksandar Kuktin [this message]
2015-10-19 21:17 ` Charles Forsyth
2015-10-19 9:14 ` Charles Forsyth
2015-10-19 19:29 ` Aleksandar Kuktin
2023-05-10 22:33 [9fans] Romano
2023-05-10 22:36 ` [9fans] RUDP and/or others unobe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151019225732.70fccc14@ikilid \
--to=akuktin@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).