From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 12:09:06 -0800 Message-Id: <20160218.120906.1664289587876463839.dhoskin@fortinet.com> To: 9fans@9fans.net From: David Hoskin In-Reply-To: <20160218142648.GA3839@polynum.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] NetSurf (browser) and Duktape (javascript) Topicbox-Message-UUID: 857333ba-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > Has anybody given them a look? I tried to play with Duktape a while ago, but gave up after having had enough of preprocessor hell. As always, portability macros have the opposite effect. -- Please excuse the following: *** Please note that this message and any attachments may contain confidential and proprietary material and information and are intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and destroy this e-mail and any attachments and all copies, whether electronic or printed. Please also note that any views, opinions, conclusions or commitments expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and do not necessarily reflect the views of Fortinet, Inc., its affiliates, and emails are not binding on Fortinet and only a writing manually signed by Fortinet's General Counsel can be a binding commitment of Fortinet to Fortinet's customers or partners. Thank you. ***