From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:05:59 +0100 From: tlaronde@polynum.com To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Message-ID: <20160222110559.GA1476@polynum.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: [9fans] rtl8169 gbe slow Topicbox-Message-UUID: 87323d7c-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:15:41PM +0200, lucio@proxima.alt.za wrote: > > 0.10u 0.22s 192.79r hget -o kertex_bundle.tar > > http://downloads.kergis.com/kertex/kertex_bundle.tar > > > > This is under 9front under virtualbox 4.3.32. > > I get, from my workstation: > > 0.21u 1.34s 50.52r hget -o /tmp/kertex_bundle.tar http://downloads.kergis.com/kertex/kertex_bundle.tar Thank you. Is it plain plan9 in this case? > > and > > term% md5sum /tmp/kertex_bundle.tar > fbf91d2c9fed66604d14c70e4ab84f5a /tmp/kertex_bundle.tar > > >From my Cape Town server: > > 0.26u 2.67s 714.38r hget -o /tmp/kertex_bundle.tar http://downloads.kergis.com/kertex/kertex_bundle.tar > > More like what you get, isn't it? Same file: Yes, on par with what I get. But I'm not under emulation: it's plain Plan9 on bare metal in my case... > This one is a VMware ESXi instance with IP address 192.96.32.148 (or > somesuch). Thanks for the data. So with what Mark van Atten and you have, the problem is not local (to my workstation) and this is why I'd like to now the difference between the VMware instance and the first with more correct download times. If it is plain plan9 (not hosted), I'm a bit puzzled... -- Thierry Laronde http://www.kergis.com/ http://www.arts-po.fr/ Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C