From: Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] problem with acme on 9front
Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 11:16:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160521181611.GA68621@wopr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94da399e3d511fd1c3eba711ce9692e0@lilly.quanstro.net>
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 10:36:44AM -0700, erik quanstrom wrote:
> > This is tantamount to saying acme is superior because you are better at
> > acme. [...]
>
> c'mon man. you follow this with several paragraphs of opinion which appear
> to say that acme is not better because you don't like it.
Yes, having explicitly set the dimensions of the field, I proceeded to
stay in bounds.
> but then again, editors don't tend to lead to logical arguments. :-)
I've never seen it happen, and I don't really expect to. I do maintain
that calling acme an editor is akin to calling New York a shopping
center.
khm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-21 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-19 18:30 christophe DAMAS
2016-05-19 18:40 ` Siarhei Zirukin
2016-05-19 19:42 ` Charles Forsyth
2016-05-19 21:51 ` Kurt H Maier
2016-05-20 0:37 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2016-05-20 1:23 ` Ethan Grammatikidis
2016-05-20 1:32 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2016-05-20 2:02 ` Ethan Grammatikidis
2016-05-20 2:07 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2016-05-20 11:58 ` hiro
2016-05-20 12:07 ` Mark van Atten
2016-05-20 15:49 ` Wes Kussmaul
2016-05-20 12:12 ` Brantley Coile
2016-05-20 20:01 ` Steve Simon
2016-05-21 21:52 ` Mark Lee Smith
2016-05-21 23:18 ` erik quanstrom
2016-05-22 7:36 ` Siarhei Zirukin
2016-05-22 17:28 ` Mark Lee Smith
2016-05-21 17:36 ` erik quanstrom
2016-05-21 18:16 ` Kurt H Maier [this message]
2016-05-21 18:28 ` Rob Pike
2016-05-21 19:21 ` Kurt H Maier
2016-05-21 23:14 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2016-05-19 18:41 ` cinap_lenrek
2016-05-19 19:20 ` Mark Lee Smith
2016-05-19 19:36 ` cinap_lenrek
2016-05-19 20:26 ` Mark Lee Smith
2016-05-19 20:37 ` Lee Fallat
2016-05-19 20:40 ` Aram Hăvărneanu
2016-05-19 20:11 ` stanley lieber
2016-05-19 20:15 ` Charles Forsyth
2016-05-19 20:53 ` stanley lieber
2016-05-19 21:13 ` Mark van Atten
2016-05-19 21:18 ` Lee Fallat
2016-05-21 19:08 ` Mark van Atten
2016-05-21 19:23 trebol55555
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160521181611.GA68621@wopr \
--to=khm@sciops.net \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).